Peer Review for Emily Bond

I went over the fascinating Emily Bond's production schedule and gave her some obviously useful tips from the pros (sarcasm intended)....enjoy.


Audience Question: How did you practice your editorial skills this week in peer review?

Perform the activity and then write a concise but detailed blog post that includes:

• I reviewed Emily Bond's Production Schedule.
• I selected to make a resource recommendation on Emily's production schedule.
• I believe I aided Emily in his production schedule by giving him advice on what she could do to go through with his production schedule. I incorporated brainstorming suggestions of sorts mentioned from the Student's Guide into my feedback of his production schedule.
• I loved that Emily's schedule is very straight forward. Her schedule is like a classic phone conversation....no awkwardness, no fluff and straight to the point.

Here is my comment on her production schedule.

Peer Review for Ben Meyer

The following is a resource recommendation I made for my deer peer Ben Meyer (unintentional rhyme). Have a field day with it!

Audience Question: How did you practice your editorial skills this week in peer review?

Author Response

Perform the activity and then write a concise but detailed blog post that includes:

• I reviewed Ben Meyer's Production Schedule.
• I selected to make a resource recommendation on Ben's production schedule.
• I believe I aided Ben in his production schedule by giving him advice on what he could do to go through with his production schedule. I incorporated brainstorming suggestions of sorts mentioned from the Student's Guide into my feedback of his production schedule.
• I loved that Ben's schedule seems very detail and thorough which is something that inspires me to get my lazy butt off the couch and go execute my own schedule as well.

Below is a link to my comment on Ben's schedule.

"Hey Ben. nice layout of your work for the production schedule! 

Some tips I would recommend to you would be to carefully brainstorm out other possible scenarios you could have in your schedule where you can go through the content and formatting of your QRG. Also, I would advise to make sure you take time in your schedule to add more images and hyperlinks to your QRG.

Good luck!"

Peer Review for Gabriela Marty

Here is my peer review for my third academic cousin once removed, Gabriela Marty...enjoy!

I reviewed Gabriela Marty's Untitled Project 3 Rhetorical Analysis.

For Gaby's rhetorical analysis I selected to make a brainstorming suggestion since I feel certain about what a rhetorical analysis could span upon into. 

I feel confident that I helped her work become more in depth and thought provoking by suggesting to her to expand her brainstorm even further.

I used certain ideas from the reading posted on D2L such as to think about what type of argument she would like to present in her third upcoming project.


Here is my comment on her blog post.

Peer Review for Jackson Starmer

The following is an overview of the peer review I performed for my fellow classmate Jackson Starmer.

I chose Jackson Starmer's "Rhetorical Analysis of Project #3" .

For Jackson's rhetorical analysis, I decided to review his work using the brainstorming suggestion as I feel I am very equipped at helping others come up with ideas and initiate concepts for a project.

I incorporated some rhetorical thinking ideas into the review as well as the reading about arguments that was posted on the D2L home page of this course.

I admired that Jackson has various potential ideas that would fit excellently into a project about a public argument.

My comment on his project could be found here.

Production Schedule

Here is the ideal schedule that I plan to do next week.

Content Outline

Here is a vague outline of my project 3.

Audience Question: How are you going to organize your project?

Introduction
Demonstrate some highlights of the U.S. women's national team from the past 4 years. Then, go from highlights to statistics of sorts of money revenue to the five women players filing the complaint for inequality.

Section A: Demonstrate the hype the USWMNT has produced in terms of viewings, sponsor revenue, athletic accomplishments, and finally show much the U.S. soccer federation gets from the women's team.

Section B: Compare the U.S. women and men soccer teams performances in the last 3 years or so.
This well back up the claim the five women are making in terms of why they believe now is the time they get their fair share of the money pie.

Section C: Show information on the revenue both teams produce. Then, demonstrate player's salaries and bonuses of each team to give audience an idea of how both team get a share of the revenues they create. Show some counterarguments and debunk them or woven them into my final conclusion.

Outro:

Conclude everything from the previous sections to further prove that the current female soccer american players should get compensated more than their male counterparts.

Reflection on Pre-Production...oh lawd

Here is my horrendous reflection on the pre production of my project.

Audience Questions

1)What were some of the successes (or, things that went right) during this week’s process work? Explain, with evidence.

Some successes were gathering my sources and information on my topic.

2)What were some of the challenges (or, things that went wrong) during this week’s process work? Explain, with evidence.

Filling out each thing about every single source. I thought some parts of it unnecessary but that is just my opinion. Also, I should have taken more time into focusing on the project.

 3)How do you think next week will go, based on your experiences this week?

I think it will go horrible then very good near the end of the week based on stuff goes down when I produce content.

4)How are you feeling about the project overall at this point?

I feel ready to go. I am very excited to just work on a topic that involves my favorite sport...soccer.